Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Thoughts for the Day

"There came a time when enough was enough. All of the excuses finally lost their power." ~Unknown~

"Sometimes a heartbreak shakes you awake and helps you see that you are worth more than what you were settling for." ~Mandy Hale~

"A big part of who you become in life has to do with who you choose to surround yourself with. Sometimes destiny controls who walks into your life, but you decide who you let stay, who you pursue, and who you let walk back out.  It's better to be alone than to be with someone who never sees your worth.  Truth be told, no human being is more superior than the other; and all collective judgments about others are wrong.  Surround yourself with people who make you a better person." ~Unknown~

"The most beautiful people I've known are those who have known trials, have known struggles, have known loss, and have found their way out of the depths.” ~Elisabeth Kübler-Ross~

"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe."
~Andy Rooney~


“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” ~attributed to Mark Twain~

Friday, November 15, 2013

Thoughts on Happiness

Are you truly happy?  Do you find yourself content and satisfied at the end of each day or at least, most days?  What contributes to your inner peace?  Your job?  Your family?  Your friends?  Success?  Career? 
 
If your answer was no, can you remember a time in your life when you were happy?  What was the different between then and now?  Is it something that you can change?
 
Do you have an idea what would make you happy?  If money were no object, if fear were not a factor; what would you do?  What currently holds you back? 
 
When I ask these questions, I am, of course, excluding currently impossible dreams such as time travel, seeing deceased loved ones again, changing something that has already occurred, etc.  I am only asking about the things that may actually be within the realm of possibility.
 
Was your answer to find "true love"?  To have a healthy romantic relationship with another?  Did you catch yourself thinking that happiness was tied to the past?  Did you see happiness as going back and taking that chance that you had with love?  To go back and do things differently in hopes that a past relationship could still exist?  It seems this is the common answer when people are asked what would make them happy.  It most often ends up being something that they feel they can not obtain on their own. 
 
For me, this has always been a bit puzzling.  I understand the desire to connect, the desire for a soul mate, the desire to love and be loved, in return.  What puzzles me in the number of people that feel they cannot be happy WITHOUT a relationship.  Bouncing from person to person, blindly being in lust and rebounding to the next person when it is discovered that the previous one wasn't the sunshine and rainbows they first appeared to be.  Or how often in life I have been asked when I would settle down, get married, have children--surely I could not be happy without these things?  It is as though most people believe being alone is not only a curse, but something to be avoided.  That somehow, life is better or only worth living when paired?
 
I read somewhere that the greatest predictor of having a lasting relationship is the ability to bounce back--be in from arguments, fights, or any other challenges the relationship faces.  This was in reference to the longevity of marriages, but certainly could apply to any relationship--be it with a partner, family member or a friend.  I recognize this difference in my current relationship.  Arguments are rare; but they seem to pass quickly, as well.  The feelings of hurt, anger and bitterness don't seem to run amok, as they do in some relationships .  I think this is, in part, because neither of us likes conflict and we avoid it unless absolutely necessary.  In other words, if a topic has the danger of destroying the relationship, it needs addressed--fighting for the sake of fighting?  That is a foreign concept.  Of course, there also aren't the harsh put-downs or attempts to intentionally hurt each other that occur in many relationships, which probably accounts for a large percentage of that resiliency. 
 
Oddly enough, my answer when previously asked what I wanted in life was always the same and always quite simple: Happiness.  Toasts were always made to "happiness."  Finding the genie in the bottle?  Don't bother with three wishes.  I only needed one: Happiness.  However, it hasn't always felt so simple getting there.
 
Recently, I watched a program that suggested that finding happiness relies greatly on the overall ability of an individual to bounce back from life's setbacks.  They suggested that happy people still feel disappointment, anger and other emotions--the difference was in their ability to let go of negative feelings and emotions faster.  I would tend to agree with this.  The longer one dwells in any feeling or emotion, the more it permeates all aspects of being.  It is hard to focus on the present when one is basking in the glow of past emotions--be it sorrow, anger, frustration.  Additionally, when we surround ourselves with negativity--be it people, situations or our own thoughts--it is difficult not to be tainted by the cloud of misery.  Relationships are much the same; if you focus on the resentment, you miss the good that is happening around you.  Too often, we miss the rainbow because all we see are the mud puddles that we are dodging.  Sometimes you just need to stop, stand still and look up.  Taking in the big picture can be quite freeing, if we let it.
 
On the flip side, dwelling in feelings of happiness not only encourages us to remain happy, but it is difficult to avoid sharing that happiness with others.  Smiles truly are contagious, after all.  We all have those people that we love to be around because their perspective is always so positive that we, too, catch that positivity and feel good, as well.   Is it that simple?  It can be.  This is part of the expression, positive attracts positive.  Think happy thoughts and you will be happy.  It sounds cliché; it is difficult when you are in a depressive state, but it is not impossible. 
 
I know that I often post darker topic matter here--be it dealing with past wounds, expressing grief or voicing frustration.  This is part of my own healing.  Dub it spiritual purging or lingual vomit, if you must--but it is part of how I, personally, move on.  Whatever the topic is on here, you can be sure it rolled around in my head and tormented me, until I finally typed it out.  Generally, getting it out on paper (or the screen, in this case) alleviates the toxicity for me.  Clearly, some experiences have been more traumatic than others and are frequently visited topics--but generally viewing them from different angles and getting it out helps it heal.  It has also freed me from being surrounded by the pain.  Releasing it from my mind and onto paper allows me to bounce back, to return to a freer state. 
 
I also believe a major factor toward internal happiness is making peace with the demons of negativity that plague our souls.  The little voice that tells us that we aren't good enough, that others have it better than us or are better than us.  The voice that tells us that we don't deserve happiness or good things or that they will soon be ripped away from us, so do not cling too tight.  That little voice that for some of us is our parents; for others, society--no matter where the voice came from or how it developed, the important part is squashing it.  Negative self talk is something that many of us engage in, without even being aware of it.  As long as you entertain and believe that voice, there can not be happiness.  The two can not coexist.  My belief is, there are plenty of naysayers ready to knock you down and that will attempt to destroy your happiness--do not let your own inner voice be one of them.  Life is too hard for that.  Choose instead to be your own best friend, your own cheerleader--when you do, positive changes will happen for you.  At the very least, your satisfaction and contentment with life will increase and I am pretty sure that is never a bad thing.
 
Truly, the key to happiness is self-acceptance.  There can be no lasting happiness or peace without it.  Waiting for someone else to take your broken pieces and put them back together doesn't work either.  It's a pleasant dream, but remember when I posted the part about REALISTIC dreams?  Two broken vessels may be pieced together to make one--but hold water, they will not.  The truth of the matter is, if we don't accept who we are, how can we expect someone else to?  If we do not love our self, we will not be capable of believing someone else loves us, either.  Until we have self-acceptance, we will ultimately seek out ulterior motives--because, surely, they can't be with us because they love us?  Don't they hear that voice listing out the flaws?  Don't they see those flaws that we see when we look in the mirror? 

Challenge you mind.  Quiet the negative talk--because yes, that voice needs squashed.  It will destroy any chances you have for happiness--with others, but most of all, within yourself.  Replace it with a loving voice; one that forgives yourself, as easily as you forgive and accept others.  And smile, even your own reflection is improved when it is smiling and happy.  Contentment, satisfaction with life and happiness will indeed follow. 

Truth.

"There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story inside you."  ~Maya Angelou~

And sometimes freedom and healing is only found by letting it out...

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Giving Love a Bad Name

One thing that I will never understand is parents that try to hurt each other through their children.  It has always been a huge pet peeve of mine and I always hated being used as a tool between my own parents.  Yet, I see parents doing this on a regular basis--within the families that I work with and in my personal relationships, with both friends and with partners.  Maybe I don't understand due to not having children; fair enough.  Yet, something inside of me says that a decent parent would not want to intentionally hurt their own child--for ANY reason.
 
My partner of six years had a child that he was forbidden to see, despite paying $400 a month in child support.  We would send birthday cards, holiday cards--only to get nasty calls that he was to stay out of the child's life, unless he was willing to be with her, again.  Attempts to discuss the situation with Domestic Relations led to them telling us to get a lawyer--but all of our money was wrapped up in child support (while she lived at home, had a good job and had it made).  He was fifteen when she got pregnant (she was in her mid-twenties); he had to drop out of high school and get a job to support a child that he wasn't allowed to see--despite desperately wanting to.  The child was used as leverage, on a regular basis, for him to leave me and go back to her.  He missed so many years of his child's life, not because he wanted to, but because she felt their child could be used as a bargaining chip.
 
The relationship prior to my six years' of abstinence?  She left him for another man; but when I entered the picture, she wanted him back.  Her line of attack?  Of course, through their child.  He was told that as long as he was seeing me, he would not be allowed to see his daughter.  This progressed to me receiving phone calls FROM the child: "Why are you with my Daddy?  It makes my Mommy cry..."  This was the same woman that sat in the bar (four years prior to me dating her ex), telling me that in two more years their relationship would be considered a "common-law marriage" and she would be entitled to half of everything he owned--including the house.  She didn't love him; but she didn't want anyone else to have him either.  Using her child for manipulation?  Not a big deal, clearly.
 
My current gripe?  A man paying $900 a month for two biological children, plus one that she had as a result of cheating on him (he knowingly signed his name to the birth certificate and has raised this child, as his own, since).  When she decided that she deserved $1600 a month, she began decreasing his visits with the children from every other weekend to once a month, because he couldn't afford to pay her that much.  Maybe it should be mentioned that he doesn't even make $1600 a month.   Maybe it should be mentioned that she has six children, four different fathers, and her current husband (and newest baby daddy) makes six figures.  Since May, when crazy financial figures were requested; she has let him see the children twice--once in August and once in September.  This is also accompanied by phone calls from the youngest child, asking if he got a better job yet.  It doesn't matter that he loves all three of the children more than life, itself.  It doesn't matter that they miss him, as well.  It doesn't matter that they went from having visits twenty-five weekends, plus three weeks in the summer per year, to five weekends in eleven months.  Hell, it doesn't even matter that he had custody for several years while she was off playing the field.  What matters is that she feels she deserves $1600 a month from him and he can't afford a lawyer.
 
It is times like this that I wonder if I took the wrong path in life.  I was the girl terrified of becoming pregnant.  I used a sponge and spermicides WITHOUT telling partners and made them use condoms, as well.  I remember having the condom break once and being in an utter panic.  I was never so relieved as when I was finally able to go on birth control.  I may have been okay with having children, except one of my biggest fears was having that tie to a man for AT LEAST eighteen years; in reality, for life.  I always viewed children as a life sentence that I never found a partner worthy of committing to.  Truly, even with a decent choice for the child's father, we still only ever have control over a fraction of the parenting experience--add in stepparents, eighteen years worth of revolving parental figures--nope, no thanks.  And I suppose my childbearing philosophy was largely due to the Hell known as living with both of my parents and the fun times after they divorced, as well.
 
I can't help but realize how many women see their children simply as a meal ticket and a free ride in life.  Did I miss the boat???  My college would have been paid for had I had children.  These student loans that I have been paying on for the past thirteen years and won't have paid off until 2035?  They are the equivalent of a nice vehicle payment and they wouldn't exist had I been a single mother attending college.  This mortgage that will also be paid off in 2035?  I could have been living for free, all of this time, were I a single mother.  But heck, who needs college when you can make enough income between the different fathers paying child support to lead a nice, cushy life and never have to work outside of the home?  Funny, how I always saw my lack of children as a responsible act.  Maybe, instead, I missed my ticket to easy street?
 
Don't get me wrong.  I know that being a full-time mother is a full-time job.  And I know that not all parents use their children as revenge and a paycheck.  This blog isn't about the parents that are working hard to raise healthy, well-adjusted children.  This blog isn't about parents that didn't plan to have children but it happened.  I am not knocking single parents that do their best to be a mom and a dad.  I have respect for anyone that loves their children and tries their best to raise them well.  This one is specifically for the parents that see an opportunity and plan their own financial security by using their bodies as a factory--the parents that willing hurt their own children and use them as tools to get what they want in life.  Forgive me if I have little to no respect for those individuals.  I know that I am being harsh; I am just tired of seeing this situation. 
 
I know that part of my anger is from working with children throughout the years and seeing the scars that parents have created by using their children as pawns.  I have seen parents searching for diagnosis labels for their children so that they can collect government money for them.  I have talked to women that were calculating how much their finances would increase by having another child and planning their pregnancy around the financial gain.  These are the parents that I do not understand. 
 
I am not suggesting that men should be free from financial obligation to their children, either.  Do not get me wrong.  And I am not saying that men do not also manipulate through their children--I have seen it go both ways.  What I am saying is that when children equal nothing more than dollar signs; there is something seriously wrong.  When children are used as a tool to hurt the ex; there is something seriously wrong.   I am suggesting that when fathers want to be involved in their children's lives (and they have proven to be good fathers), but the mothers will not let them, risking hurting their own child--emotionally, psychologically, or in any other manner; there is something seriously wrong.  If other people feel that I am being judgmental and hateful by posting this; there may be something seriously wrong there, too. 
 
As a child that was hurt by such games; as an individual working to correct the damage created to children by these games; as a woman that has watched many males that I care about suffer and their children, as well--I must say that there is something wrong with a society that not only permits this, but sees it as being all right.  Truly, there are more good fathers out there than people realize.  There are many men being raked over the coals when they shouldn't be.  There are way too many children suffering, because their parents put their own desires above the needs of their children.  I wish more people would think about these issues when putting their children in the middle of their "ex wars."  And, yes, we do grow up and see the truth--no matter what lies we are fed in youth.  For some of us, the scars are deep enough that we can't even fathom having our own children.   I wouldn't wish those experiences upon anyone; certainly not my own child, that I would imagine I would want to protect and care for. 
 
My belief is that parents are to love their children and want what is best for them.  My belief is that parents should have a unified goal to raise their children to become healthy, well-adjusted adults.  And with all of that comes: playing nice with the ex, not bad-mouthing the ex in front of the children, and encouraging positive interactions between BOTH parents and the child.  Maybe I am a romantic, wishing that children could have access to both parents and could find unconditional love through both their mother and father, whether together or apart.  Maybe I am old-fashioned in believing that parents have an obligation to raise children that are taught to be self-sufficient.  Maybe I believe that raising children to manipulate, to cheat the system and other human beings, teaching them to put their own needs above the ones they "love" and teaching them to hurt each other simply because they can--maybe I see this as a piece of society's current breakdown.
 
But again, what do I know?  I am told these actions are completely justifiable.  I am told that I just don't understand because I don't have children.  If someone has a sane answer to these actions, please, clue me in.  If financial gain and creating manipulation tools are what having children is about, I stand firm in having made the choice to not reproduce.  I realize that maybe this blog posting was a bit harsh; but I am so tired of seeing children hurt by parents, for any reason.  I also struggle with understanding why there are not more individuals offended by these situations.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Living Within Realistic Limits

As someone that works with low-income families and families living well below the poverty level, I am always astounded by the events surrounding Christmas.  Although, I wouldn't say it is limited to just the families that I work with; going into extreme financial distress, maxing out the credit cards and even bankruptcy seems to be the new Christmas family tradition.  Or maybe this has always been the norm and I just wasn't privy to the details, in the past.

I, too, grew up well below the poverty level.  Our mother had many severe health problems--lupus, diabetes, high blood pressure, bipolar manic depression--working wasn't an option since she often was confined to her bed for days, sometimes weeks, at a time.  Our father wasn't big on helping out and had no interest in us, financially or emotionally.  We grew up in the system and it was a normal fact of life--the end of the month meant unique challenges.  The end of the month meant no toilet paper--we used magazine pages, newspaper or other papers and kept a garbage bag close to the toilet for the "recycled" results.  Meals often consisted of tri-colored pasta or other foodbank handouts.  I must say, the foodbank choices of this era amaze me.  Now the food bank offers donuts, pizzas, pies--I am always amazed by what the families that I work with tote home after visits.  Today's foodbanks are more like a food lottery of choices, variety, and products that they would buy given the choice.  It was strictly staples when I was growing up--rice, pasta, a block of cheese. 

Despite working with families below the poverty level, I have yet to work with any that have been even close to living how my two brothers and I did, as children.  We rarely had vehicles.  We often went years at a time with no car.  My mom had a cart that we would wheel to the grocery store and wheel back home.  Thankfully, we only lived about two miles from the grocery store, but it was still embarrassing and I hated going along.  Clothes were hand-me-downs from cousins, church members, neighbors.  I remember being in high school and being forced to wear pants that had previously belonged to an extremely obese male; I was frequently bullied and teased because of my clothes, as a result.  We made do with what we had.  We didn't have any other option. 

Growing up, I was embarrassed by my situation.  We got free school lunches, but I was too embarrassed to be "that kid."  As a result, I never ate lunch, not even once, from seventh grade through graduation.  There weren't as many of us during the 80's, as there are now.  Today, it is pretty common to get free lunches and I am not sure that the other students even know if someone else gets free lunch.  Growing up, I also came to hate the first week of school, Christmas, Easter--all of the times that the other students flaunted their new clothing, their handheld arcade games and all of the other things that I so desperately hoped to discover deposited overnight, within my household, as well.

Christmas was generally an item or two that the school nurse would allow me to pick out for my brothers.  Sometimes we got presents from the Salvation Army.  That was always a neat surprise because as the oldest, I knew the truth of our financial situation.  Somehow, my mom always managed to keep the Salvation Army presents hidden until Christmas morning; when I, too, would awake to discover gifts under the tree.  A sweater, some make-up--it was never much--but it was unexpected.  Even more mystifying to me was the other holidays when peers returned to school with new outfits, toys, and other spoils.  Easter?  We got jelly beans and some chocolate--never the mini-Christmas peers and cousins got.  Birthdays?  I got my favorite cake and some small gifts.  Even the beginning of the school year, we would generally get a new pair of tennis shoes, a bookbag, some pencils and crayons--an elaborate new wardrobe?  Not unless people donated clothing concurrently, with school beginning.

Today, as an adult, I do not look back on that time bitterly.  I learned early that life wasn't fair.  I learned that we don't always get what we want.  I learned that, in fact, we rarely get what we want in life.   I learned that I do not require the best of everything; and above that, I don't put the value upon material possessions that I see amongst my peers.   I learned how to make money stretch and how to make household items go further.  I learned that you do not spend what you do not have.  I learned to take care of myself.  I learned how to be independent.  I learned how to survive.

Beyond that, I developed imagination and creativity.  I learned how to creatively make things better than what they started out as.  I have learned that I can recycle "junk" into something unique and now desired by others.  I am able to see earthly goods--be it surroundings, clothing, or simple household items and not only imagine transformation, but then make it happen. Growing up without store bought items, my imagination was stretched to create what I desired and wanted through available resources.  This is a gift that growing up in extreme poverty brought me that has proven invaluable throughout my life.

I still don't believe in name brands and labels.  I don't see women with their Prada or Coach purses and think, "Gee, they must lead fabulous lives--I wish I could be like them."  I see the adult products of childhood entitlement grown up and still believing that they need to prove something to the world through material possessions.  I see people that are never satisfied and run themselves into debt to make themselves feel better with an often shallow existence.  Is that truly something to be jealous of?  No, I don't wish for their shoes--but the bright side is: today, yes, I could afford them if I wished.  I just don't see labels and name brands as something that I need to prove my worth.

I do not have outstanding debt.  My vehicle may be a rustbucket--but it is paid for and I will run it until it disintegrates.  Coworkers have made the comment "You still drive that?"  Well, yeah--why not?  I do not desire a monthly vehicle payment nor do I want the added stress of worrying about scratches or dings.   My attire?  Goodwill, thrift stores--I easily walk out with ten outfits for twenty dollars because people that only see me as the labels and brands that I wear are people that I have no desire to impress to begin with.  Only underwear, bras and socks are bought new and that is far and few between, as well.  Dining out?  Beyond the fact that it is mostly high-calorie junk, I have a hard time justifying the price tags attached and it becomes a rare treat and one that I am willing to pay more for, on the off occasions when I do indulge.  I have not had cable or the equivalent since 1999.  Living within a budget is simple.  You do not spend beyond what you have.  I pay my credit cards off each month not only to avoid interest, but because it just makes sense.  The debt I carry?  Eight years of college and my mortgage. 

Everything that I have today, I worked hard for.  I have never had anyone to help me.  I have never been able to rely on anyone else for my financial success.  Growing up in poverty made me desire more for my own future.  I worked hard to be financially independent because it has always been just me.  If I can't take care of myself, who will?  I don't regret my childhood, but I also didn't want to spend the rest of my life in constant fear of living on the streets.  While some women dreamed of elaborate weddings, children and marriage--my vision was for a future where I owned my own home and was able to survive without depending on anyone else.  Poverty created that dream.  Poverty motivated my success.

Hard times?  Yeah, I still have them, too--on a regular basis--don't get me wrong.  But I am also able to look at most things and say "Do I really need that?  Can I make do with what I have?"  Thankfully, most often the answer is yes.  I am not saying that I am better than anyone else or that my way of living is the correct one.  What I am saying, is that it doesn't have to be as hard as the majority of the population makes it.  I have learned to cut corners to such a degree that my world seems strange to many viewing it--but I have learned to trade "things" for experiences.  It doesn't work for everyone; but for me, this is the preferred existence.

As a result of my own experiences, I do not understand when parents feel that they must sacrifice and work insane schedules just to provide their children with "all of the things that they never had growing up."  I see that often with the parents of today and I do not believe that they do their children favors with that belief.  I believe children benefit more from quality time with their parents as opposed to material possessions.  Memories last; "stuff" doesn't.  I know which holds more value for me.  Those special birthday cakes my mom would bake for my birthday?  Simple angel food cakes; flavored with Kool-Aid to create orange, strawberry and other amazing flavors.  It is the cakes that I remember with fondness--not the gifts.  It is the time and love that she put into creating something uniquely for me.  Looking back, the gifts that she hand made hold so much more value than the store-bought items. 

Winter is coming and with it, Christmas.  I see the frantic parents around me.  I see the financial burden they create for themselves in an effort to shower gifts upon their children.  I get it.  Don't get me wrong.  I understand wanting to give the best to loved ones.  I understand wanting that magic.  What I don't understand is digging such large holes, when the magic isn't in the boxes under the tree.  Possessions only bring fleeting happiness and often have a unique price paid along with them--there is an unseen burden attached to possessions.  It is in the memories--decorating the home together, watching movies together--it is the time spent together that they will remember and cherish, in the end.

The families that I see going into financial distress and maxing out their credit cards in the name of family tradition; in the name of creating a better life for their children?  I view it as farce.  This is parents teaching their children that they are entitled.  This is parents teaching children that their worth is based upon how much they have and the label attached to it.  This is parents teaching children that love has a price-tag.  Society complains about individuals believing that they are entitled, that they deserve hand-outs; while they create these monsters within their own homes.  These parents, believing that they are doing what is best for their children, inadvertently rob them of some of the best gifts that life has to offer.   They rob their children of creativity, of learning to make do, of learning to live within their limits.  These are gifts that I wouldn't trade for the world.

I hear some of my readers saying, "What do you know?  You don't have children.  You don't understand."  What I can tell you is that, as a human and having once been a child, it didn't kill me to not have as much as my peers.  As an adult that works with children and teenagers, seeing the effects of giving them whatever they want is not pretty.  Not being able to tell children "no", does not a good parent make.  Being a friend, as opposed to a parent, isn't the answer.  Buying them the world doesn't make them happier or better people--those are the illusions our society has created and that our media attempts to sell us.    Think back to your own childhood, your own cherished memories--do you truly disagree???

Monday, November 4, 2013

In the Shadows--Part II of III

The PFA-ex was hung up on one of his exes throughout our relationship.  Well, not so much her, personally--but more specifically, her breasts.  I went through that relationship being made to feel inadequate due to being a 36C as opposed to a 48D.  Funny, one of his comments after I left and he was attempting to win me back, was: "I watch porn with women that have breasts shaped and sized like yours, now."  Flattering; I know.  Oddly enough, when we started dating he often told me how nice my breasts were due to never having had children.  As our relationship progressed and he became more abusive, I was regularly reminded about his ex's huge breasts and was encouraged to seek breast augmentation.  And still, despite his frequent criticism of my small breasts; he regularly made negative comments regarding what age and gravity does to big breasts, hers included.  Maybe he just (not so) secretly hated women.
 
The PFA ex was so trapped in the past and the glory days of teenage sexual escapades that he missed most of our time together.  After I left, I was added to his list of past regrets.  Suddenly, I became his soulmate and everything that he wanted in a woman.  Funny, how that works.  When we were together, he was "sacrificing" by being with me; after I left, he decided that I was his entire world and all that was good in it.  I have wondered since, if he puts his current girlfriends through similar, daily torture of how they don't meet up to aspects that I, myself, carried.  It really wouldn't surprise me.  It is part of how abusers destroy a partner's self-esteem and convince them that if they don't stay with them, the partner will be alone forever.  Part of the abuse is convincing the partner, that no matter how horrible they are, that the abuser is kindly enough to sacrifice himself and his potential for greatness by staying with them.  He tears down self-esteem and in its place puts a belief that no one else could possible want to be with you; because, yes, you are that disgusting, fucked-up and worthless.  Typical abuser manipulation.
 
Looking back, I think maybe he had an ex-fetish, in general.  Perhaps it was an obsession with attempting to reclaim what he has lost.   The fact that he regularly cheated on "48D"; with an ex that came before her, really only supports this suspicion.  While I was with him, he raved about all of his exes--but she was the one he still had the most regular contact with and tormented me the most through.  Maybe his obsession with exes was something beyond the excitement of cheating and getting away with it? 
 
Perhaps believing that his exes still wanted him, increased his own feelings of self-worth?  Perhaps, cheating with exes was more about continued conquest, "still having it", and other internal rewards that I may never understand.  Maybe because they had been with him before, knew what they were getting and were still interested--perhaps this was even more emotionally rewarding than his other indiscretions?  Because truly, to suggest that he only cheated with exes would be very unfair.  He genuinely was an equal-opportunity adulterer, no questions asked--it just seemed that returning to already tasted forbidden fruits was his preference.  Maybe it was more about "how can I be that bad of a guy when these women still want to be with me?" 
 
Their motivation for being with him again?  Yeah, I can't say.  Well, actually, I probably can.  He had a passion for older women, mother figures and most importantly--woman that already had houses, financial security and that he could not only avoid providing for, but that had the potential to provide for him, instead.  I was one of the very few younger woman that he dated--most were ten years or more his senior.  But I, too, had my own house, possessions, financial security--his primary attractants.  Additionally, I had practiced six years of celibacy prior to my relationship with him.  Maybe not extremely common for someone in their late 20's/early 30's, but I was very guarded.  By the time he entered my life, I was just looking for fun--nothing serious.  And honestly, after six years, I didn't care so much about the fact that he was a scofflaw; but was just wanting to scratch an itch, so to say.  I didn't think that I would fall for him. 
 
I know, now, that he preyed upon financially secure women and took all that he could get from them.  Up until now, I missed what I had in common with his relationships over the past two decades.  He generally went for older women because they were easier to tear down; they were less secure with the fact that they were with a much younger guy.  He frequently mentioned how they would be embarrassed by being mistaken for his mother, as opposed to his partner.  He frequently made comments to me about how he could get "fresh, hot, young girls anytime he wanted"--I suspect that this was a leftover taunt commonly used with his older women and that he had a habit of throwing it out as a retort.  I see now, where all of us were easy targets; his favorite kind.  And of course,  bonus, for him; I was overweight, at the time that we met--generally a decent area for attacking self-worth.  And that he did--over and over.
 
So, Mr. PFA-ex, I think I get it.  Initial attraction: a healthy combination of financial security and the potential to destroy an already shaky self-esteem.  The mystery of his ex obsession.  Yes, I think I understand that a bit better, now too, as well.  These other women were probably easily "swept up" into his extra-curricular activities in much the same way that they fell for him in the first place--hot, younger guy looking beyond their age and showing interest in them?  Easy.  Add his "younger playboy" appeal to the fact that he is seeing someone else now and still "can't be without them"?  Good lords, no wonder he has so many ex-affairs throughout all of his relationships.   Granted, many weren't the nicest of women and I am sure they didn't care that he was in a relationship when they cheated with him.  I'm sure it boosted their damaged self-esteem, just as he was boosting his own.  I don't know that I really "got it" before today. 
 
It's funny. I was happy with my breasts before I met him.  They were an area that I felt was "just right."  How like an abuser to take the few areas that we feel secure in and destroy that security.  The rest is easy, after that.  Maybe it never was so much about my small breast size.   Maybe the cheating wasn't just about my physical inadequacy, as he led me to believe.  Maybe these are wounds that I can cast aside and realize I may have fallen victim, but it happens to the best of us.  And maybe, I should have never taken any of that nastiness to heart, in the first place.

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Truth.

"A man who views the world

the same at fifty

as he did at twenty

has wasted thirty years

of his life."

 

~Muhammad Ali~

Friday, November 1, 2013

Día de los Muertos

 
It's here! It's here! It's here! Día de los Muertos, my favorite holiday; yes, even above Halloween!!!  Sugar skulls, marigolds, flowers, face paint, food, beverages and candles! Offerings of gifts for the dead; graveside vigils and offerings--candles lit to guide the way...
 
 
Since I do not have time to get into it, today; I have also included the link to my 2011 post regarding Dia de los Muertos and why I began celebrating it.  Besides, of course, the fact that it is a beautiful holiday and so preferred over the American view of death; a private matter, that is best not talked about.  A view that leads to mental health issues, festering illness and eternal grief.
 
And so why not?  A celebration that honors the lives and memories of the ones who are no longer with us? A celebration suggesting that their life was worth living and therefore, remembering and honoring.  This just makes sense to me.  And would our loved ones not prefer us to be happy?  Would it be that the veil is indeed thin, I believe they would prefer the merriness to sorrow and tears.  I would, were it me behind the veil...